Former Watford forward Troy Deeney has launched a strong critique of Mohamed Salah, questioning both his attitude and long-term legendary status at Liverpool.
In a blunt assessment, Deeney argued that while Salah’s talent is undeniable, his overall contribution falls short of what defines an all-time great at the club.
Deeney points to Salah’s leadership
Deeney pointed to what he described as inconsistent leadership, contrasting Salah with teammate Virgil van Dijk. According to him, Van Dijk has consistently taken responsibility in difficult moments, while Salah has been less visible when results turn negative.
He also criticised the winger’s public conduct, suggesting that certain actions this season have created unnecessary distractions within the squad.
Deeney referenced past incidents, including reported disagreements with former manager Jürgen Klopp and recent tension under current boss Arne Slot.
Not the full package”
Despite Salah’s goal-scoring record, Deeney insisted that greatness at a club like Liverpool requires more than individual output.
He argued that being a “figurehead” involves consistent accountability and influence beyond performances on the pitch; areas where he believes Salah has fallen short.
Deeney also dismissed comparisons between Salah and Thierry Henry, calling such debates unfounded given the broader criteria used to judge elite players.
Pressure on Liverpool dressing room
The former Watford striker suggested that Salah’s behaviour could have wider implications within the squad, particularly at a time when Liverpool are dealing with inconsistent form and internal pressure.
He noted that players like Curtis Jones have publicly addressed issues around physicality and mentality, raising questions about collective responsibility.
Deeney concluded that Slot should be assessed more fairly once off-field distractions are reduced, implying that Salah’s situation has complicated the manager’s second season.