The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rep. Abbas Tajudeen, has defended the proposed State Police Bill, assuring Nigerians that adequate constitutional safeguards have been included to prevent governors and political actors from using state police as private security outfits. LawEnforcement
Abbas spoke on the issue on Wednesday, July 15 at the National Security Roundtable held as part of activities marking the 2026 National Assembly Open Week.
The Speaker acknowledged concerns that state police could be abused by governors or political leaders but said the proposed legislation was deliberately structured to prevent such occurrences.
“I understand the concern that many people bring to this discussion, and it is a reasonable one. It is the fear that a State Police could become the private army of a governor or a political godfather,” Abbas said. “The people who drafted this Bill had the same fear, and they answered it.”
He explained that under the proposed constitutional amendment, governors would not have exclusive powers to appoint or remove state Commissioners of Police. According to him, appointments would be made based on the recommendation of the National Police Council and subject to confirmation by the State House of Assembly, while removal would require the support of two-thirds of lawmakers and must be based on proven misconduct.
Abbas also said the proposed legislation empowers the Federal Police to intervene where a state police service becomes compromised, but only under clearly defined constitutional conditions. LawEnforcement
“If a State Police breaks down, or falls into the wrong hands, or turns against the very people it should protect, the Constitution allows the Federal Police to step in… only in defined situations, only in writing, only for a limited period, with notice to the Governor and to the National Assembly within forty-eight hours, and always subject to the courts,” he said.
He stressed that the proposal would not allow the Federal Government to dissolve a state police service or suspend elected state institutions, describing the provisions as necessary safeguards for Nigeria’s federal structure.
The Speaker said President Bola Tinubu had taken a historic step by transmitting an Executive Bill on state police to the National Assembly after decades of debate without decisive action.
“For the first time in our history, a sitting President has made State Police a central part of national reform,” Abbas said.
He argued that Nigeria’s centralised policing system was no longer sufficient to address emerging security challenges such as banditry, kidnapping, farmer-herder clashes and attacks on schools.
“A country as large and as varied as ours cannot be policed forever by one central Force run from the capital,” he said, stressing the need for security officers who understand local communities.
Abbas explained that the proposed amendment would change the name of the Nigeria Police Force to the Federal Police Service while allowing states that meet constitutional requirements to establish their own police services. He noted that no state police service would begin operations until the State House of Assembly enacted enabling legislation and the state met operational standards set by the National Assembly.
Under the proposal, he said, the Federal Police Service would retain responsibility for terrorism, border security, federal offences and policing of the Federal Capital Territory, while state police would focus on maintaining law and order within their jurisdictions. LawEnforcement
He added that state police services would be supervised by independent State Police Service Commissions, receive direct funding and operate under strict restrictions against the use of police powers for political, ethnic or religious purposes. LawEnforcement
Citing examples from countries including Germany, Canada, India and the United States, Abbas said successful federal policing systems depend on national standards, intelligence sharing and strong accountability mechanisms.
Despite backing the proposal, the Speaker said lawmakers would carefully review issues such as funding, operational standards, intelligence coordination and the integration of existing vigilante and community security groups before passing the legislation.